Interlocutory Appeals

Those familiar with North Carolina appellate jurisprudence are well aware that what constitutes “a substantial right” for the purposes of conferring jurisdiction over an interlocutory order is an issue that

Continue Reading What Does the Supreme Court of North Carolina Consider To Be a “Substantial Right”?

The Supreme Court stated in Dogwood v. White Oak, 362 N.C. 191, 657 S.E.2d 361 (2008), that noncompliance with nonjurisdictional rules normally should not lead to the dismissal of an
Continue Reading When Do Appellate Rules Violations Rise To The Level Of Jurisdictional Requirements?

Generally speaking, an appeal stops all proceedings at the trial court level until the appeal concludes. However, as we have previously blogged (here, here, here, and
Continue Reading The Court of Appeals Again Recognizes the Trial Court’s Jurisdiction to Decide the Appealability of Interlocutory Orders When Deciding Whether the § 1-294 Stay Applies

Tuesday’s batch of opinions from the Court of Appeals contained a smorgasbord of jurisdictional issues pertaining to interlocutory appeals. In no particular order:

Department of Transportation v. Riddle

This condemnation
Continue Reading A Jurisdictional Jamboree (including an RPR sighting!)

The Fourth Circuit issued an interesting, unpublished opinion on Tuesday in Kelly v. Conner  in which it sua sponte dismissed a party’s appeal for want of jurisdiction and remanded to

Continue Reading Does “Dismissed and Remanded” Effectively Mean “Reversed”?

There are few concepts that are as important to our nation’s jurisprudence as that of jurisdiction. As stated by the Supreme Court of the United States, “Jurisdiction is the power

Continue Reading No Jurisdiction Means No Jurisdiction (Except When It Doesn’t)